Situation: Friendly home tournament game. Heads up play. The flop is out. Player A bets and Player B raises. Player B turns around to get his drink. Player A picks their cards up off of the table. Player B turns around and sees no cards on the table and throws their hand into the middle. Player A says thats a fold, with the cards still in front of their face. Player B says , I did not see the cards and thought they were folded. Player B’s cards did not hit the burn cards or anything else and were very clearly identifiable. I grabbed them and said no it is not a fold because you had your cards off of the table. I asked Player A to keep their cards on the table and I asked Player B to make sure of the action that has been taken before cards are thrown in. I realize I should have immediately asked Player A to keep their cards on the table but I did not catch it this time. The player had constantly been picking up their cards and had been warned many times. There were some statements that in a casino that the cards would have been folded. I just am not sure. I feel like the best interest of the game was served because Player A did something that induced a bad move by Player B. I really feel like Player A may have done it to try to get the action that was taken. Good or bad decision??
You must be logged in to post a comment.
August 18, 2008 at 5:30 pm
Great decision because 1) Player A had very significant contributory negligence to Player B’s admittedly stupid move and 2) The cards are 100% identifiable.